|
LCBA
VERDICTS & ORDER REPORT
View Local Verdict
Archives
From
March 2004
Newsletter:
LCBA VERDICTS & ORDER REPORT
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Patricia Woods and Link E. Reid v. Hakan Lars
Velander
Type of Injuries: Plaintiff Woods: Aggravation of a herniated
cervical disk, Plaintiff Reid: Back and Neck pain
Date of Jury Trial: November 17 and 19-20, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D10-0122-CT-00525
Name of Judge: Judge John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: $ Plaintiff Woods: $2,820.75; Plaintiff Reid:
$1,394.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Patrick McFarland for Plaintiff Woods;
Jerry Peteet for Plaintiff Reid
Attorney for Defendant: Galen Bradley
Case Information: On July 23, 2001, the Defendant, while driving
intoxicated, struck the rear of the vehicle driven by Patricia Woods who
was traveling south in the 4000 block of Grant Street in Gary, Indiana.
The Defendant then put his car in reverse and struck Plaintiff Link Reid
who had stopped behind the Defendant after the first collision had
occurred.
Paintiff Woods claimed that although she had been diagnosed with a
herniated cervical disk prior to July 23, 2001, her condition was being
effectively managed through conservative treatment. She contended that
as a result of the accident, surgery became necessary, following which
she developed additional complications. Plaintiff Woods claimed to have
incurred medical expenses directly related to this accident in the
amount of $47, 370.68, and pain and suffering.
Plaintiff Reid
claimed medical expenses in the amount of $1,394.00, attorney fees and
pain and suffering.
The Defendant
admitted liability for both collisions but disputed the nature and
extent of each Plaintiff’s claimed injuries and damages.
The Jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Woods against the
Defendant and awarded each Plaintiff’s claimed injuries and damages.
The Jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Woods and against the
Defendant and awarded damages in the amount of $2,820.75. The Jury
further returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Reid and against the
Defendant and awarded damages in the amount of $1,394.00
----------
Type of Action: Premises Liability
Name of Case: Lee Farley v. Hobart Ridge Corporation d/b/a/
Wiseway Food Center of Hobart
Type of Injuries: Head and shoulder contusion, neck and back
pain, rotator cuff tear
Date of Jury Trial: December 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D10-0202-PL-00032
Name of Judge: Judge John J. Pera
Damages Awarded: $82,500.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Donald Schlyer and David Novak
Attorney for Defendant: Timothy Swan and Elizabeth Moore
Case Information: Plaintiff claimed that on February 10, 2000,
while exiting the Wiseway grocery store in Hobart, Indiana, both the
store floor near the foyer and the foyer floor were wet, the floor mat
in the foyer was buckled and not laying flat, and there was poor
lighting in the foyer. Plaintiff alleged that while he was walking
through the store toward the foyer, he slipped on the wet floor, caught
his foot on the buckled mat in the foyer and fell forward, striking the
wall and landing on the floor. Plaintiff contended he suffered injuries
to his forehead, neck, back and both shoulders.
Plaintiff claimed medical
expenses in the amount of $9,665.09, possible future medical expenses
for surgery, pain and suffering and permanent injury to his shoulders.
The Defendant denied it
violated any duty of care to the Plaintiff or that it was negligent. The
Defendant further disputed the nature and extent of Plaintiff’s claimed
injuries and damages.
The Jury found 45%
liability attributable to the Plaintiff and 55% attributable to the
Defendant. Finding damages in the amount of $150,000.00, the Jury
awarded in its verdict for the Plaintiff the sum of $82,500.00.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Thomas Watkins and Bessie Watkins v. Conor Ruel
Type of Injuries: Thomas: pain in right shoulder, neck and right
hip; Bessie: pain in right shoulder, neck, and right knee and foot;
contusions
Date of Jury Trial: December 15 and 16, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D01-9809-CT-740
Name of Judge: Judge Jeffery J. Dywan
Damages Awarded: Thomas: $0.00,
Bessie: $1,255.42
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict: Thomas:
Defendant’s Verdict; Bessie: Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Barry D. Sherman, Kirsten D. Hill
Attorney for Defendant: Harold Hagberg
Defendant’s Insurance Carrier: Allstate Insurance Company
Case Information: On June 16, 1997, a collision occurred on
westbound Michigan Avenue approaching its intersection with Indianapolis
Boulevard in Hammond, Indiana. Both vehicles were westbound as the
Defendant was attempting to make a left-hand turn. Plaintiff Bessie
Watkins was a passenger in an automobile being operated by Plaintiff
Thomas Watkins.
Plaintiffs’ losses
claimed were medical expenses of $6,661.95 for Plaintiff Thomas Watkins
and $6,277.12 for Plaintiff Bessie Watkins. The Jury assessed fault as
80 percent to Plaintiff Thomas Watkins, zero percent to Plaintiff Bessie
Watkins and 20 percent to Defendant. As to Plaintiff Thomas Watkins’
claim, the verdict returned was for Defendant. As to Plaintiff Bessie
Watkins’ claim, total damages awarded were $6,277.12. The verdict
returned for Plaintiff Bessie Watkins was $1,255.42.
Plaintiffs’ physician who
testified was Teofilo Bautista, M.D.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Deanne O’Brien v. Michael Giglio
Type of Injuries: Head, neck and back injuries; neck and pack
pain with headaches
Date of Jury Trial: December 15 and 16, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D11-0101-CT-00044
Name of Judge: Judge John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: $5,400.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Edward R. Hall and Natasha Bukorvic
Attorney for Defendant: Jennifer L. McCloskey
Case Information: Plaintiff claimed that on May 6, 998, she was
operating her vehicle eastbound on 29th Avenue and stopped for a stop
sign its intersection with Colfax Street. As she proceeded to turn left
onto Colfax Street, she was Struck on the Driver’s side by the vehicle
operated by the Defendant who was traveling southbound on Colfax Street.
Plaintiff contended and the Defendant did not dispute that the Defendant
failed to stop at the stop sign at Colfax and 29th Avenue. The Plaintiff
further claimed that the Defendant was traveling at an excessive rate of
speed for the road and weather conditions and failed to maintain a
proper lookout which was disputed by the Defendant.
Plaintiff claimed medical
expenses in the amount of $5,155.50, pain and suffering, and continuing
headaches as a result of this accident.
The Defendant claimed he
did not see the stop sign because of overhanging branches which
obstructed his vision. He also contended that the Plaintiff was
negligently operating her vehicle, disregarded the stop sign, exceeded
the posted speed limit, and failed to keep a proper lookout. Defendant
further disputed the nature and extent of Plaintiff‘s claimed injuries
and damages.
The Jury found 10% fault
attributable to the Plaintiff and 90% attributable to the Defendant.
Finding damages in the amount of $6,000.00, the Jury awarded its verdict
for the Plaintiff the sum of $5,400.00.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Lauren Martino v. Kevin Benda
Type of Injuries: Neck pain
Date of Jury Trial: December 15 and 19, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D11-0201-CT-4
Name of Judge: Judge Jeffery J. Dywan
Damages Awarded: $400.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Steven J. Sersic
Attorney for Defendant: Thomas C. Higgins
Defendant’s Insurance Carrier: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Company
Plaintiff’s Demand: $1,000.00
Defendant’s Offer: None
Case Information: On January 24, 2000, a collision occurred on
northbound U.S. 41 near Lake Central High School in St. John, Indiana.
Plaintiff claimed that she and the vehicle behind her were stopped when
the Defendant struck the vehicle behind the Plaintiff in the rear which
then struck the Plaintiff. Defendant claimed that he was struck in the
rear by Nonparty Anne Kovacs, and he then struck the vehicle behind the
Plaintiff in the rear.
Plaintiff’s losses
claimed were medical expenses of $1,304.00. The Jury assessed fault as
10 percent to Defendant and 90 percent to Nonparty Anne Kovacs. Total
damages awarded were $4,000.00. The verdict returned was $400.00.
Plaintiff settled with
Nonparty Anne Kovacs prior to trial for $4,000.00. Kovacs’ insurance
carrier was Farmers Insurance.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Diane Kasper v. Darnally Malaves
Type of Injuries: Neck, shoulder, and low back pain
Date of Jury Trial: December 15, 18 and 19, 2003
Court/Case No.: 45D10-0112-CT-00517
Name of Judge: Judge John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: None
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Defendant’s Verdict
Attorney for Plaintiff: Patrick McFarland
Attorney for Defendant: Edward Hearn
Case Information: Plaintiff claimed that on December 11, 2000,
the Defendant operated her vehicle on 45th Avenue near Liable Road in
Highland, Indiana in a negligent matter in poor weather conditions so as
to collide with a vehicle driven by Richard McLamb which caused a
collision between Mr. McLamb and the Plaintiff.
Plaintiff claimed medical
expenses in the amount of $8,262.30, pain and suffering, and continued
low back pain.
Defendant denied that she
was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. Defendant contended that
she was faced with a sudden emergency when an unidentified white vehicle
pulled out into her lane of traffic from Liable Road, causing her to
swerve and loose control of her vehicle. Defendant further disputed the
nature, extent and proximate cause of Plaintiff’s claimed injuries and
damages.
The Jury returned its
verdict in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff.
----------
Type of Action: Personal Injury – Car Crash (rear-end)
Name of Case: Victoria Peracki v. Allstate and Scott Tai Juan
Type of Injuries: Neck
Date of Jury Trial: January 12, 13, 14, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45C01-0003-CT-00171
Name of Judge: Lorenzo Arredondo
Damages Awarded: $60,000.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Attorney for Plaintiff: Jeffrey Meunies
Attorney for Defendant: Harold Hagberg
Case Information: This lawsuit has been brought by Plaintiff,
Victoria Peracki, against Defendant, Scott Tai Juan and Allstate
Insurance Co.. The Plaintiff claims that on May 3, 1999 she was driving
her automobile in an northerly direction on Broadway in Lake County,
Indiana when she was struck in the rear of her vehicle by another
vehicle. The driver of the other vehicle fled the scene of the accident
and has not been able to be located since the date of the accident. The
other driver was at the time of the accident an uninsured motorist. At
the time of the accident Victoria Peracki had a policy of Insurance
through Defendant Allstate Insurance Company which provided coverage for
damages caused by uninsured motorists. Plaintiff claims that the
Defendant was negligent and that she was injured and that the acts of
the Defendant were the proximate cause of her injuries.
----------
Type of Action: Medical Negligence
Name of Case: Stephanie Milner v. Prinn K. Stang. M.D.
Type of Injuries: Undiagnosed pregnancy requiring second
trimester abortion
Date of Jury Trial: January 12 and 13, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D11-0103-CT-94
Name of Judge: Jeffery J. Dywan
Damages Awarded: $0.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Defendant’s Verdict
Attorney for Plaintiff: Richard A. Miller, Hillary Hall
Attorney for Defendant: James M. Portelli
Defendant’s Insurance Carrier: Pro Assurance Company
Plaintiff’s Demand: $4,500.00
Defendant’s Offer: None
Case Information: On May 12, 1999, Plaintiff presented herself to
the Defendant with complaints of missed menstrual periods, hot and cold
flashes, bloating, constipation and abdominal cramping. Per the
Defendant’s instructions, Plaintiff had a series of blood tests
performed at St. Anthony Medical Center on May 16, 1999. Defendant
testified that he instructed Plaintiff to return in two weeks. Plaintiff
returned back to the Defendant’s office on July 16, 1999 with similar
complaints at which time the Defendant informed the Plaintiff that she
was pregnant.
Plaintiff claimed that
Defendant was negligent in failing to promptly inform her of her blood
test results indicating she was pregnant. By the time the Plaintiff was
informed, she had progressed from the first to the second trimester of
pregnancy. Plaintiff testified that she had to go to Illinois to have an
abortion performed in a hospital under anesthesia.
The Defendant claimed that Plaintiff was contributory negligent in
failing to return to the office two weeks after her first appointment.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Carolyn J. Nelson v. Robert J. Consier and Lakisha
L. Gill
Type of Injuries: Neck and back pain
Date of Jury Trial: January 12 and 14, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D11-0105-CT-200
Name of Judge: Jeffery J. Dywan
Damages Awarded: $228.80 (v. Defendant Robert Consier) -
$2,059.20 (v. Defendant Lakisha Gill)
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Hawk P. Kautz
Attorney for Defendant: Edward W. Hearn
Defendant’s Insurance Carrier: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Company
Defendant’s Offer: $12,500.00
Defendant’s Offer: $100.00
Case Information: On February 6, 2001, Plaintiff testified that
she was a passenger in a vehicle being driven by Defendant, Lakisha
Gill, which was involved in a collision with a vehicle being driven by
Defendant, Robert Consier, on Ridge Road near its intersection with
Wisconsin Street in Lake Station, Lake County, Indiana. The Plaintiff
claimed the Defendants operated their vehicles in a negligent and
careless manner so as to cause such collision.
Plaintiff’s losses
claimed were medical expenses of $2,288.00. The Jury assessed fault as
10 percent to Defendant Robert Consier and 90 percent to Defendant
Lakisha Gill. Total damages awarded were $2,288.00. The verdict returned
was $228.80 versus Defendant Robert Consier and $2,059.20 versus
Defendant Lakisha Gill.
----------
Type of Action: Premises Liability
Name of Case: Roxanne F. Flynn v. Peoples Federal Trust No. 5013
Type of Injuries: Trial on issue of liability only per
Bifurcation Order
Date of Jury Trial: January 12, 13, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D10-0111-CT-00469
Name of Judge: John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: N/A
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Defendant’s Verdict
Attorney for Plaintiff: Mark Psimos
Attorney for Defendant: Carolyn Fehring
Case Information: The Plaintiff claimed that on May 11, 2003, as
a result of Defendant’s negligence in properly maintaining its premises
located at 140-318 West Lincoln Hwy. in Schererville, Indiana, she fell
and suffered personal injury, pain and suffering. Plaintiff claimed she
fell as a result of stepping on a stone in the parking lot. The
Defendant denied that it negligently maintained the premises. Pursuant
to an Order entered on April 4, 2003 granting Bifurcation, the trial was
conducted for the limited purpose of determining liability.
Commercial Sweeping Corporation, named as a co-Defendant and represented
by Robert D. Hawk, Jr., was dismissed on its Motion for Directed Verdict
at the conclusion of Plaintiff’s case.
The Jury returned a
Verdict in favor of the Defendant, Peoples Federal Trust No. 5013, the
owner of the premises, and against the Plaintiff, Roxanne F. Flynn.
----------
Type of Action: Automobile Accident
Name of Case: Evgenia Vavoulas v. Kenya V. Veasy
Type of Injuries: Neck, shoulder and permanent low back pain
Date of Jury Trial: January 12, 14, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D10-0112-CT-00516
Name of Judge: John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: $35,000.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Compensatory
Attorney for Plaintiff: Barry Sherman, Kristen Hill
Attorney for Defendant: Vincent Mirkov
Case Information: The parties stipulated that the Defendant was
the cause of and at fault for a collision that occurred on July 7, 2000,
in which the Plaintiff’s vehicle, while stopped on northbound Broadway
near its intersection with 47th Avenue in Gary, Indiana, was struck in
the rear by the vehicle driven by the Defendant. The Plaintiff claimed
she suffered neck, shoulder, and back pain, incurred medical expenses in
the amount of $7,062.50, lost income in the amount of $10,062.00,
experienced pain and suffering and continues to suffer daily pain in her
lower back.
The Defendant disputed the nature and extent of Plaintiff’s injuries and
damages, and that the collision was the proximate cause of said injuries
and damages.
The Jury returned a
verdict in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant and awarded
damages in the amount of $35,000.00.
----------
Type of Action: Personal Injury – car crash
Name of Case: Lon Childress v. Gloria Rawlins
Type of Injuries: Partial rotator cuff tear
Date of Jury Trial: January 26, 27, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45C01-0002-CT-00118
Name of Judge: Lorenzo Arredondo
Damages Awarded: $5,098
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Attorney for Plaintiff: Joseph Irak
Attorney for Defendant: Harold Hagberg
Case Information: On March 8, 1999, in a Post Office parking lot
the Defendant backed out of the parking space and collided with the
Plaintiff.
The crash report states
the primary cause of the accident was, “unsafe backing”, and “driver
inattention” on the part of the Defendant. Plaintiff claims he sustained
bodily injuries to his left shoulder consisting of a partial rotator
cuff tear and incurred $3,723 for medical treatment and may be required
to expend further sums in the future.
Defendant claims the
Plaintiff was comparatively at fault and disputes the nature and extent
of the injuries claimed by the Plaintiff.
----------
Type of Action: Trip and Fall
Name of Case: Nancy and Winfield E. Smick, Jr. v. F.W. Hugh and
Cynthia St. Leger
Type of Injuries: Depressed fracture of radial head in both
elbows, knee pain
Date of Jury Trial: January 26 and 27, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D01-0003-CT-00080
Name of Judge: John R. Pera
Damages Awarded: N/A
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Defendants’ Verdict
Attorney for Plaintiff: Timothy F. Kelly, Beth L. Brown
Attorney for Defendant: Bridgett J. Repay, Amy J. Godshalk
Case Information: Plaintiffs contended that Nancy Smick was
injured on August 3, 1999, when she fell on the sidewalk outside the
home of the Defendants, Hugh and Cynthia St. Leger in Munster, Indiana.
Plaintiffs claimed that the fall was the result of the negligence of the
defendants in falling to maintain and repair the sidewalk, which they
claim was broken and uneven, and in failing to warn of the poor
condition of sidewalk.
Plaintiff, Nancy Smick,
claimed damages for medical expenses in the amount of $4,011.88, pain,
mental suffering and permanency. Plaintiff, Winfield E. Smick, Jr.,
claimed the loss of consortium of his wife, Nancy.
The Defendants denied
that they were negligent, willful or reckless in any manner, that the
Plaintiff was at fault, and such fault was the sole proximate cause or
contributing cause of any and all injuries and damages alleged by the
plaintiffs.
The Jury returned its
Verdict in favor of the Defendants, Hugh and Cynthia St. Leger, and
against the Plaintiffs Nancy and Winfield Smick.
----------
Type of Action: Civil Tort
Name of Case: Dolores Wright et al v. Ricky L. Westray et al
Type of Injuries: Severe scalp laceration; contusions; resultant
brain impairment; anxiety; depression.
Date of Jury Trial: January 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 2004
Court/Case No.: 45D05-9712-CT-2394
Name of Judge: Robert A. Pete
Damages Awarded: Dolores Wright – compensatory - $1,020,000.00;
John Wright – compensatory - $100,000.00; Samuel Wright – compensatory -
$25,000.00; Punitive damages awarded - $15,000,000.00
Specify Compensatory, Punitive or Defendant’s Verdict:
Attorney for Plaintiff: David W. Holub
Attorney for Defendant: Gary Klages
Case Information: On December 23, 1996, Dolores Wright claimed
that she was permanently injured when Defendants’ semi-truck operator
consciously chose to abandon his duty to watch the road ahead, and at
highway speed, collided with the rear of two cars stopped at a red
stoplight near the intersection of I-65 and the Indiana Toll Road. The
two cars were stopped at the red stoplight in the northbound traffic
lanes of I-65 when Defendants’ tractor trailer impacted into the
rear-end of the Wright car injuring Dolores and her then infant son who
was thrown from the automobile.
Defendants’ tractor
trailer was operated by Ricky Westray who was dispatched to load a
moving van and drive it from Ohio to Illinois. He was en route in
Indiana and failed to stop for a clearly visible red stoplight and
traffic lawfully stopped at the I-65 and the Indiana Toll Road.
At the time of the crash,
Defendant Ricky Westray was an employee of Defendants Bekins Van Lines,
Co., Richardson Moving & Storage, Inc, and Miami Valley Moving &
Storage, Inc. Ricky Westray.
The Plaintiffs claimed
that the Defendants were negligent, and that their negligence was the
cause of the collision. The Plaintiffs further claimed that the
Defendants acted with gross negligence or willful, wanton and conscious
disregard for the safety and rights of others, and that such conduct was
also a cause of the collision and is of the type and character that the
law sets apart for punitive consideration by a jury.
The Plaintiffs claimed
that they suffered personal injuries as a result of the collision, and
that the negligence and fault of the Defendants was the proximate cause
of their injuries. The Plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive
damages.
The Defendants
acknowledged that the tractor-trailer was driven by Defendant, Ricky
Westray. At the time of the occurrence, Ricky Westray was employed by
Defendant Bekins Van Lines, Co., Richardson Moving & Storage, Inc. and
Miami Valley Moving & Storage, Inc.
The Plaintiff John Wright
claimed that he was deprived of the services and consortium of his
spouse Dolores Wright, and would be deprived of those services in the
near future.
The Plaintiffs claimed to be entitled to an award of punitive damages
because the Defendants acted with gross negligence or willful, wanton
and conscious disregard for the safety and rights of others, and that
such conduct was also a cause of the collision.
The Defendants did not
contest fault relative to Plaintiffs’ claim of negligence regarding the
operation of the vehicle by Ricky Westray at the time of the occurrence. However, the Defendants
denied that they were negligent in any other way. Defendants denied that
they acted with gross negligence of willful, wanton and conscious
disregard for the safety and rights of others, or any other conduct
warranting punitive damages. The Defendants also denied both the nature
and extent of injuries claimed by Plaintiffs, Dolores Wright, John
Wright, and Samuel Wright.
This accident also
resulted in the deaths of two persons in Plaintiff’s vehicle, and
serious injury to two other persons in another vehicle.
|